The recent decision by the South African government to file an urgent order against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) has sparked a range of reactions from different parties.
While some, including the African National Congress (ANC), have applauded the move as a commitment to justice and human rights, the South African Jewish Board of Deputies (SAJBD) has criticized it as a publicity stunt lacking credibility and understanding.
The government’s request to the ICJ, filed in The Hague, seeks a declaration that Israel is in breach of its obligations under the Genocide Convention and calls for an immediate cessation of all acts of genocide in the conflict in Gaza.
[ SAPS Advises South Africans To Celebrate New Year’s Eve Responsibly ]
However, the SAJBD argues that South Africa is humbling itself in the international arena by selectively using international organizations like the ICJ when it suits their political purpose, while ignoring them when it doesn’t.
The SAJBD points out that South Africa has previously disregarded its duties to the International Criminal Court (ICC) by failing to arrest Omar al-Bashir, who was wanted by the ICC.
The organization also criticizes the government for inviting President Putin to attend the BRICS Summit, which they believe undermined South Africa’s international responsibilities. According to the SAJBD, these actions demonstrate a lack of consistency and understanding of international law.
The SAJBD had previously met with President Cyril Ramaphosa to discuss the conflict and urged the government to engage with both sides of the war, using its influence to facilitate a peaceful resolution.
The organization believes that instead of playing a positive role, South Africa has chosen to file a case against Israel at the ICJ, which they consider to be a media-seeking stunt lacking credibility.
In contrast, the ANC stands in solidarity with the South African government’s decision to seek justice through international legal mechanisms. The party emphasizes its commitment to upholding values of peace, justice, and human dignity.
They believe that accountability for any violations of international law is crucial and stress the need for a comprehensive and fair investigation to determine responsibility.
The differing reactions to South Africa’s move against Israel highlight the complexity of the conflict and the challenges faced by governments in navigating international relations.
While some view the government’s action as a principled stand for justice, others argue that it undermines South Africa’s credibility and fails to contribute to a peaceful resolution.
It is important for South Africa, as well as other nations, to carefully consider the implications of their actions in the international arena.
Engaging in selective use of international organizations and inconsistent adherence to international law can undermine a country’s standing and effectiveness in addressing global challenges.
Catch up with the latest news from The Times Post on WhatsApp by following our channel. Click here to join.