The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) have suffered a setback in their attempt to force Parliament to allow their MPs, including leader Julius Malema, Mbuyiseni Ndlozi, and deputy Floyd Shivambu, to attend the State of the Nation Address (SONA).
The Western Cape High Court has struck off the EFF’s urgent application, meaning that the party’s leadership will not be present at SONA after being suspended for the month of February.
Last year, Malema and Shivambu were sanctioned for disrupting President Cyril Ramaphosa during the previous SONA. The National Assembly adopted the report of the powers and privileges committee, which recommended their suspension in February, effectively barring them from attending this year’s SONA.
[ ANC ‘Ready To Defend Itself’ Against Zuma In Possible Court Action After Suspension ]
The EFF approached the court on an urgent basis to challenge this decision, but the court ruled against them. Judge Nathan Erasmus, while delivering the ruling, expressed disappointment at the EFF’s late filing of papers, stating that it was their own doing.
He said, “The application is struck from the roll. The applicants shall pay the first, second, third, and sixth respondents’ costs of the application.” However, it is worth noting that Judge Daniel Thulare dissented from the majority decision, stating that the applicants raised novel and complex constitutional issues.
Despite the setback, the EFF’s attempt to challenge their suspension highlights the party’s determination to assert its presence and influence within Parliament. The party has consistently positioned itself as a vocal opposition force, unafraid to challenge the status quo and disrupt proceedings when necessary.
While the EFF’s application may have failed, it is essential to recognize the broader context in which this dispute takes place. The State of the Nation Address is a significant event in South African politics, where the President outlines the government’s plans and priorities for the coming year.
It is an opportunity for MPs to engage in robust debate and hold the executive accountable. However, this year’s SONA will be different due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.
The event will be scaled down, with limited attendance and adherence to strict health protocols. The absence of the EFF’s leadership may dampen the level of opposition and dissent during the address, but it does not diminish the importance of parliamentary oversight and democratic engagement.
It is worth noting that the EFF’s suspension is not without controversy. Supporters of the party argue that the punishment is politically motivated and an attempt to stifle dissent. They argue that the EFF’s disruptive tactics are a legitimate form of protest against government corruption and inequality.
On the other hand, critics argue that the EFF’s behaviour during SONA undermines the decorum and dignity of Parliament. They contend that disruptive actions hinder constructive debate and compromise the functioning of democratic institutions.
The court’s ruling, while disappointing for the EFF, may be seen by some as a necessary step to maintain order and uphold the integrity of parliamentary proceedings. As Parliament prepares for next month’s SONA, it is essential for all parties involved to reflect on the broader significance of this event.
SONA is not just a platform for political grandstanding; it is an opportunity to address the pressing issues facing the nation and to demonstrate a commitment to good governance and accountability.
Catch up with the latest news from The Times Post on WhatsApp by following our channel. Click here to join.
