The High Court in Pretoria recently heard an application made by the police for the arrest of singer Kelly Khumalo in connection with the murder of her lover, football star Senzo Meyiwa. This revelation came to light as two men accused of killing Meyiwa alleged that Khumalo had ordered the hit on the footballer.
The murder, which occurred in October 2014 at Khumalo’s mother’s home, was initially believed to be a robbery gone wrong. However, the police now believe that Khumalo played a significant role in the crime.
During the court proceedings, Brigadier Bongani Gininda stated that the police had already believed in 2020 when the case was first enrolled in court, that Kelly Khumalo had ordered the hit on Meyiwa.
[ Kelly Khumalo Ordered Senzo Meyiwa’s Shooting According To Lead Investigator ]
Despite this belief, Khumalo has not been brought to trial alongside the five men currently standing trial for the murder. Gininda revealed that the police had taken steps to have her arrested, including applying for a J50 warrant of arrest.
However, this application was not signed, and the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) decided to indict only the five accused individuals. According to Section 219 of the Criminal Procedure Act, no confession made by one person can be admissible as evidence against another.
This legal provision raises questions about the admissibility of the accused men’s claims implicating Khumalo as the mastermind behind the murder. It remains to be seen whether the police will continue to pursue Khumalo and bring her to court.
The revelation of the police application for Khumalo’s arrest has sparked public interest and raised concerns about the progress of the investigation. Many are questioning why Khumalo has not been included in the trial, given the allegations made against her.
The decision by the NPA to indict only the five accused individuals suggests that they have deemed the evidence against Khumalo insufficient or legally inadmissible. It is important to note that while the police believe Khumalo ordered the hit on Meyiwa, these allegations have not been proven in a court of law.
The burden of proof lies with the prosecution, and they must present sufficient evidence to establish Khumalo’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Until then, Khumalo remains innocent until proven guilty.
The case has once again brought attention to the issue of gender-based violence and the role of women in such crimes. It highlights the importance of thoroughly investigating all individuals potentially involved in a crime, regardless of their gender or social standing. The justice system must ensure that all relevant parties are held accountable for their actions.
Catch up with the latest news from The Times Post on WhatsApp by following our channel. Click here to join.
